Force Majeure in Swiss Contract Law
Force majeure: definition, conditions, consequences on contract performance and distinction from subsequent impossibility under art. 97 and 119 CO.
Last updated : 2026-04-14
Definition
Swiss law has no general statutory definition. The Federal Supreme Court defines force majeure as an extraordinary, unforeseeable and irresistible event that cannot be prevented by reasonable measures. Classic examples: natural disasters, wars, terrorism, pandemics. Fortuitous events are related but distinct: unforeseeable but not necessarily irresistible.
Subsequent Impossibility (art. 119 CO)
Art. 119 para. 1 CO: when performance becomes impossible due to circumstances not attributable to the debtor, the obligation is extinguished. Must be objective (impossible for anyone) and definitive. The debtor is released; in bilateral contracts, they lose the right to counter-performance and must return what was received (art. 119 para. 2 CO).
Conditions
Objective impossibility: not merely more difficult or costly. Not attributable: if the debtor is responsible, art. 97 CO (damages) applies instead. Subsequent: arising after contract conclusion. Pre-existing impossibility may render the contract void (art. 20 CO).
Contract Adaptation (clausula rebus sic stantibus)
When performance remains possible but becomes excessively onerous due to fundamental change of circumstances, courts may exceptionally adapt or dissolve the contract. Strict conditions: unforeseeable, fundamental change; no other contractual remedy. Applied with great restraint.
Contractual Force Majeure Clauses
Parties may define force majeure events and consequences contractually, providing legal certainty beyond art. 119 CO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Was the COVID-19 pandemic force majeure under Swiss law?
Depends on specific circumstances. Government-ordered measures may constitute force majeure if rendering performance objectively impossible, but not if merely making it more difficult or costly.
Is price increase a case of force majeure?
No. Mere cost increase does not constitute impossibility under art. 119 CO. In extreme cases, the clausula rebus sic stantibus might apply.
Must the debtor pay damages in case of force majeure?
No, if the impossibility is not attributable to the debtor. Art. 119 CO extinguishes the obligation without compensation.
Editorial note
This article is provided for general information on Swiss law. It does not constitute legal advice and is no substitute for consulting a professional.
Related articles
Defects of Consent in Swiss Law: Mistake, Fraud, Duress
Analysis of defects of consent in Swiss contract law: fundamental mistake, fraud and duress, with applicable CO provisions and conditions for invalidation.
Breach of Contract in Switzerland: Legal Consequences
Legal consequences of breach of contract: default, damages, specific performance and termination under the Code of Obligations.
Warranty for Defects in Swiss Sales Law
The warranty regime for defects in goods sold: seller obligations, defect notification, buyer rights under art. 197 et seq. CO.